• Resources
  •   >  Social security disability
Social security disabilityDisability news and reports

Americans Divided on Social Security's Future, Fairness, and Financial Security

Written by
Sarah Aitchison
Attorney
Published March 3, 2025
4 min read
Why trust us?

Atticus offers free, high-quality disability advice for Americans who can't work. Our team of Stanford and Harvard-trained lawyers has a combined 15+ years of legal experience and has helped over 50,000 Americans apply for disability benefits.

See if you qualify

Social Security is a cornerstone of retirement planning, yet Americans remain deeply divided on it. The Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law in January 2025, eliminates benefit reductions for certain public sector workers, but awareness of the reform remains low. At the same time, concerns over Social Security's long-term solvency persist, with many Americans skeptical about government action to protect their benefits.

To understand public sentiment, we surveyed 1,006 Americans about their trust in the system, financial security in retirement, and preferred solutions for strengthening Social Security. The results highlight generational and political divides, revealing widespread concerns over the program's sustainability and fairness.

Key takeaways

  • Only 28% of Americans are aware of the Social Security reform that could boost their benefits.

  • 41% of Americans believe Social Security is fair, while 36% say it's unfair. Baby boomers (49%) are the most confident in its fairness, but only 31% of Gen Z agree.

  • 42% of retirees would still work a part-time job, even if they received an extra $360 per month in Social Security benefits.

  • Even with the potential increase, 15% still feel insecure about living comfortably in retirement, and 13% are financially unstable.

  • 37% of Americans don't believe Social Security will be solvent for future generations, with skepticism highest among Gen X (42%), Gen Z (40%), and Millennials (39%).

  • 55% of Americans would pay 1% more in taxes to sustain Social Security, but 37% oppose tax increases.


Awareness and trust in Social Security reform

Many Americans remain unaware of Social Security reforms and have varying levels of trust in the system's future. Public opinion on its fairness and the government's role in maintaining benefits also reveals generational and political divides.

Infographic showing awareness and perceptions of the Social Security Fairness Act, including percentages of support and opposition among various demographics.

Only 28% of Americans were aware of the Social Security Fairness Act despite it already being signed into law. The act reverses past reductions that affected over 3.2 million retirees, including teachers, firefighters, police officers, and federal employees covered by the Civil Service Retirement System. Awareness of the act was highest among baby boomers (33%), who are closest to or already in retirement, while younger generations were less familiar. 

Survey results showing public trust in the government to preserve Social Security benefits and perceptions of fairness in the Social Security system.

Trust in the government's ability to protect Social Security was mixed. Democrats (46%) were more likely to distrust the government than Republicans (35%). Among generations, Gen X (50%) expressed the highest distrust, reflecting their concern as they near retirement, while Gen Z (39%) and baby boomers (40%) were the most optimistic.

Opinions on fairness were also divided: 41% of Americans believed Social Security was fair to all retirees, while 36% considered it unfair. Baby boomers (49%) were the most confident in the system's fairness, compared to just 31% of Gen Z.

Gen X remained the most skeptical, with 39% saying Social Security is unfair. Politically, 46% of Democrats and 40% of Republicans believed it to be fair, while 35% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats viewed it as unfair.

Despite concerns, 68% of Americans thought the government should prioritize strengthening Social Security over encouraging private retirement options, signaling strong public support for a government-backed retirement program.


Financial security in retirement: Would an increase be enough?

According to the Social Security Administration, benefit increases due to the new law will vary. Some recipients may see only a small change, while others could receive over $1,000 more per month, depending on their pension and benefit type. Those affected by the Windfall Elimination Provision are expected to see an average increase of $360 per month by December. Despite these adjustments, many retirees remain uncertain about whether Social Security alone will provide financial stability.

Infographic illustrating the impact of an additional $360 per month on retirement planning, showing how it affects retirement timelines and expenditure categories among current and future retirees.

With an additional $360 per month, 74% of retirees said they would feel more financially secure, compared to only 49% of future retirees (respondents 40 years or older who have not yet retired). Similarly, 68% of retirees believed they could live comfortably with the increase, while only 47% of future retirees shared that confidence. However, despite the added income, 15% of retirees still felt insecure about their financial future, and 13% remained financially unstable.

Even with this potential boost, many Americans were not ready to rely solely on Social Security. Among retirees, 42% said they would still take on a part-time job. Additionally, 60% of both current retirees and future retirees would consider working in some capacity during retirement. These findings highlight ongoing concerns about the program's ability to provide full financial stability.


Concerns about Social Security's future and possible solutions

Americans remain divided on the long-term stability of Social Security and how best to strengthen it. While many support policy changes to sustain the program, opinions vary across generations and political affiliations.

Infographic detailing public concerns about the future of Social Security, showing that 37% of Americans don't believe it will remain solvent for future generations, with a breakdown of opinions by generation.

More than a third of Americans (37%) believed Social Security wouldn't be solvent for future generations, with Gen X (42%), Gen Z (40%), and millennials (39%) expressing the most skepticism. Baby boomers and Gen X (52% and 56%) showed the highest levels of concern, while younger generations were more optimistic. Still, 42% of millennials and 36% of Gen Z acknowledged that reforms would be needed.

When asked how to secure Social Security's future, 63% of Americans supported reducing benefits for higher earners, making it the most popular solution. Another 41% favored raising payroll taxes, while only 20% supported increasing the retirement age. Gen Z (25%) was the most likely to support raising the retirement age.

Funding solutions also revealed a political divide. While 55% of Americans said they would pay 1% more in taxes to sustain Social Security, 37% opposed tax increases. Support was strongest among Democrats (68%), and 46% of Republicans agreed. However, nearly half of Republicans (48%) rejected the proposal, compared to only 24% of Democrats.


A divided future for Social Security

While the Social Security Fairness Act removes penalties for certain workers, broader concerns about the program's sustainability remain. Many Americans support tax increases or benefit adjustments to strengthen Social Security, but skepticism about government action persists — especially among Gen X and younger generations. As financial concerns grow, a significant portion of retirees and future retirees still plan to work during retirement, signaling that Social Security alone may not be enough to ensure financial security.

Methodology

We surveyed 1,006 Americans in February 2025 to assess public awareness, perceptions, and concerns about the Social Security Fairness Act and its impact on retirement planning. Among them, 14% identified as retirees. When the term "future retirees" was used, it referred to respondents aged 40 or older who had not yet retired. The generational breakdown of all respondents included 7% Gen Z, 22% millennials, 43% Gen X, and 27% baby boomers. Politically, 44% were Democrats, 29% Republican, and 28% Independent. Percentages in this study may not total 100% exactly due to rounding.

About Atticus

Atticus makes finding legal help easy. We're the first place people in crisis can turn to claim the aid they deserve.

Fair use statement

You are welcome to share this study for noncommercial purposes. Please include a link back to this page so others can access the full findings and methodology.

Get help applying for Social Security Disability Insurance.

Sarah Aitchison

Attorney

Sarah is an attorney at Atticus Law, P.C. Prior to joining Atticus, she was a civil public defender in Brooklyn, NY and a business reporter in Seattle, WA. She is a graduate of the University of Washington School of Law.
About Us
  • Mission
  • Careers

At the bottom of many websites, you'll find a small disclaimer: "We are not a law firm and are not qualified to give legal advice." If you see this, run the other way. These people can't help you: they're prohibited by law from giving meaningful advice, recommending specific lawyers, or even telling you whether you need a lawyer at all.

There’s no disclaimer here: Atticus is a law firm, and we are qualified to give legal advice. We can answer your most pressing questions, make clear recommendations, and search far and wide to find the right lawyer for you.

Two important things to note: If we give you legal advice, it will be through a lawyer on our staff communicating with you directly. (Don't make important decisions about your case based solely on this or any other website.) And if we take you on as a client, it will be through a document you sign. (No attorney-client relationship arises from using this site or calling us.)

  • © 2025 Atticus Law, P.C.

Terms | Privacy | California Privacy | CHD Policy | Disclaimer | This website is lawyer advertising.